Lake Las Vegas Ice Skating

While ice skating may not be the first thing that comes to mind when you think of Christmas in Las Vegas, even without the snow, the floating skating rink at Lake Las Vegas holds on to the traditional Christmas pastime.

For the fourth year, Lake Las Vegas kicked off the holiday season with their floating Rockefeller Center sized skating rink. The ice rink floats on the 320-acre lake, off the shore of MonteLago Village and is open to skaters of all ages. It uses 110 five gallon buckets of water and 12,000-pound chiller unit to help keep the ice cold, and can hold up to 60 skaters at a time.

Starting off the holidays in Las Vegas, Lake Las Vegas Resort hosted it’s ceremonial tree lighting, with an appearance by Santa Claus and a special musical performance by Green Valley Choir and Helen Joy Choir on Friday, November 16.
Marketing Director Cary Krukowski says “Every year we love to create an environment that brings families closer together, builds festive traditions and allows us to be part of their memories.”

The Lake Las Vegas ice rink is open every day from noon to 9 p.m. through February 17. The cost is $15 per person, $12 for children 12 years of age and under. Groups of 20 or more are $8 a person and season passes are also available for $125 (including the cost of skate rentals).

Lake Las Vegas is host to other fun and holiday-themed events as well. The popular annual gingerbread competition runs daily until December 22nd, as well as holiday shopping and visits from Santa Claus at Monte Lago until December 23rd.
For more about the holiday events at Lake Las Vegas resort, call 564-1600 or visit

To learn more about Las Vegas or Las Vegas Condos pleas visit ONE Las Vegas at

Source by Ariel

Carbon Copy Pro Review & Recap MasterMarketing Training Event

The Carbon Copy Pro Marketing Event brought Network marketers from all over the world Countries like Japan, the United Kindom, New Zealand, South Africa and many others. Would you travel more than 24 hours to get to a one day online network marketing training event, some of these men and women did.

It was the hype created by the anticipation of meeting and learning from the top internet network marketing professionals in the world that attracted so many.. In attendance were Jay Kubassek and Aarron Parkinson (Carbon Copy Pro), Brian Fanale (MLMLeadsystemPro), Ferny Ceballos and Raymond Fong (SEO Networker) and Kip Herridge and Karl Bessey (Wealth Masters International).

The affair was held at the Paris Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas Nevada USA. The air was filled energy and excitement in anticipation of the release of the new Carbon Copy Pro 3.0 Internet Network Marketing Training and Education System. The MC was John Jackson who is Vice President of Leadership Development and he did a splendid job of keeping things rolling and on time during the day.

The real training was kicked off by the online video marketing authority of the stars , Mike Koenigs of Traffic Geyser. Mike laid out precisely how and what a skilled marketer needs to successfully make and distribute video on the internet for profit. He was followed by an inspirational story of a Carbon Copy Pro Leader and her son. He was hearing impaired from a young age, until very recently, due to developments in technology. Able to overcome his handicap he not only started his own business, but also become an excellent speaker, as everyone in attendance could confirm. Before lunch it was entirely about the power of the spouse with a exceptional panel. This was a top producers rags to riches story told from a perspective most of us had never heard.

The afternoon was everthing you would expect from an internet network marketing training conference. The titles of the afternoon sessions say it all:

“Killer Keywords” by Cherie Yvette (The Urban Cowgirl)

“Step by Step to Seven Figures” Andrew Cass (CCPro Top Earner)

“The Millionaire Roundtable” by Aaron Parkinson (CCPro Co-Founder)

And And finally the moment we had all been waiting for, the New Internet Network Marketing Training and Education System was unwrapped. A proven global internet marketing system was the incubator for this new concept that has revolutionalized training in an industry that before was only for those within. Carbon Copy Pro has always had powerful network marketing training, tools and support available to professional internet network marketing veterans and newbie’s alike. So what is different is spoken in the new slogan, “teach anyone to market anything from anywhere the internet is present.”

Business owners small and large are suffering in these current times, CarbonCopyPro 3.0 has opened the door to the future, which may help a couple of entrepreneurs keep their doors from closing. Small business owners, direct sales people and anyone with a product or service to market can take advantage of this training. At a time in our history when instant gratification is expected by most, these two men have created a product and plan to help those who desire, get exactly that.

Source by Jim Whittaker Sr

M1 Carbine

Development history

Limitations of weapons in the U.S. arsenal

During the 1920s, the U.S. Army had sought a handier semi-automatic rifle in a lighter caliber to replace the bolt-action M1903 rifle chambered for the same powerful .30-06 Springfield standard round used in the BAR and the M1917/M1919 machine guns. U.S. Army Ordnance tested in competition semi-automatic rifles designed by John C. Garand, by John T. Thompson’s Auto-Ordnance Corp. and by John D. Pedersen. After acceptance of the rifle designed by Garand and chambered for the .276 Pedersen cartridge, the decision was made to keep the .30-06 round to simplify logistics. Standardized in 1936, the .30-06 M1 rifle was approximately one pound heavier than the M1903 it was replacing.

A U.S. Marine with the M1 carbine in Guam, 1944.

A Saginaw M1 carbine, made in Grand Rapids, Michigan, used by Marines in the Pacific Theater in World War II.

For many specialist soldiers serving in the rapidly evolving modern U.S. Army just prior to World War II, the full-size infantry rifle as an individual weapon had proved unworkable. This included an increasing proportion of service troops (truck drivers, supply personnel, radiomen, and linemen) as well as some specialist frontline troops who might need a handier weapon (paratroopers, officers, forward observers, medics, engineers and mortar crews). During prewar and early war field exercises, it was noticed that these troops, when issued the rifle, often found their individual weapon too heavy and cumbersome. In addition to impeding the soldier’s mobility, a slung rifle would frequently catch on brush, bang the helmet, or tilt it over the eyes. Many soldiers found the rifle slid off the shoulder unless slung diagonally across the back, where it prevented the wearing of standard field packs and haversacks. Alternate weapons such as the M1911 pistol and M1917 revolver, while undeniably convenient, were often insufficiently accurate or powerful. The Thompson submachine gun was very effective in close-range combat but nonetheless heavy, limited in effective range (50-75 meters) and penetration, and not significantly easier to carry or maintain than the service rifle.

U.S. Army Ordnance decided that a new weapon was needed for these other roles but determined that a weapon for non-combat soldiers should add no more than five pounds to their existing equipment load. The requirement for the new firearm called for a defensive weapon with an effective range of 300 yards, much lighter and handier than the rifle, with greater range, firepower, and accuracy than the pistol, while weighing half as much as the submachine gun.

Designing the M1 carbine

In 1938, the Chief of Infantry requested the Ordnance Department develop a “light rifle” or carbine, though the formal requirement for the weapon type was not approved until 1940. This led to a competition in 1941 by major U.S. firearm companies and designers. The prototypes for the US M1 carbine were chambered for a new cartridge, the .30 Carbine, a smaller and lighter .30 caliber (7.62 mm) round very different from the .30-’06 in both design and performance. The .30 Carbine cartridge was intermediate in muzzle energy (ME) and muzzle velocity (MV). Essentially a rimless version of the obsolete .32 Winchester Self-Loading cartridge, the .30 Carbine had a round-nose 110 gr (7.1 g) bullet. From the M1 Carbine’s 18 in (460 mm) barrel, the .30 Carbine cartridge produced a muzzle velocity of approximately 1,970 ft/s (600 m/s).

Winchester at first did not submit a design, as it was occupied in developing the .30-06 Winchester M2 Military Rifle. The rifle originated as a design by Jonathan “Ed” Browning, brother of the famous firearm designer John Browning. A couple of months after Ed Browning’s death in May 1939, Winchester hired ex-convict David M. “Carbine” Williams, a convicted murderer and former bootlegger who had begun work on a short-stroke gas piston design while serving a prison sentence. (This unlikely story was the loose basis of the 1952 movie Carbine Williams starring James Stewart.) Winchester hoped Williams would be able to complete various designs left unfinished by Ed Browning. Williams insisted on the incorporation of his short-stroke piston in the existing design. After the Marine Corps semi-automatic rifle trials in 1940, Browning’s rear-locking tilting bolt design proved unreliable in sandy conditions. As a result, the rifle was redesigned to incorporate a Garand-style rotating bolt and operating rod. By May 1941, the M2 rifle prototype had been shaved from about 9.5 lb (4.3 kg) to a mere 7.5 lb (3.4 kg).

From prototype to completion

Winchester contacted the Ordnance Department to examine their rifle design. Ordnance believed the design could be scaled down to a carbine which weighed 4.5 to 4.75 lb (2.02.2 kg). In response, Major Ren Studler demanded a carbine prototype as soon as possible. The first model was developed at Winchester in 13 days by William C. Roemer, Fred Humeston and three other Winchester engineers under supervision of Edwin Pugsley, essentially Williams’ last version of the .30-06 M2 scaled down to the .30 SL cartridge. This patchwork prototype was cobbled together using the trigger housing and lockwork of a Winchester M1905 rifle and a modified Garand operating rod. The prototype was an immediate hit with Army observers.

81 mm mortar crew in action at Camp Carson, Colorado, April 24, 1943. The soldier on the left has a slung M1 Carbine.

After the initial Army testing in August 1941, the Winchester design team set out to develop a more refined version. Williams participated in the finishing of this test prototype. The second prototype competed successfully against other carbine candidates in September 1941, and Winchester was notified of their victory the very next month. Standardization as the M1 Carbine was approved in October 22, 1941. Contrary to popular myth, Williams had little to do with the carbine’s development, with the exception of his short-stroke gas piston design. As a matter of fact, Williams went about creating his own design apart from the other Winchester staff. Williams’ final carbine design was not ready for testing until December 1941, two months after the Winchester M1 Carbine had been adopted and type-classified. None of William’s additional design features were incorporated into later M1 production. The supervisor of the carbine project at Winchester, Edwin Pugsley, conceded that Williams’ final design was “an advance on the one that was accepted”, but noted that Williams’ decision to go it alone was a distinct impediment to the project. Further, in a memo in response to a possible lawsuit by Williams, in 1951 Winchester noted his patent for the short-stroke piston had been improperly granted as a previous patent covering the same principle of operation was overlooked at the patent office.

Another stimulus to the carbine’s rapid development was a concern over Germany’s use of glider-borne and paratroop forces to infiltrate and attack strategic points behind the front lines, forcing support units and line-of-communications forces into combat with the enemy. Tankers, drivers, artillery crews, mortar crews, and other personnel were also issued the M1 carbine in lieu of the larger, heavier M1 rifle. Belatedly, a folding-stock version of the M1 carbine was developed, after a request was made for a compact and light infantry arm for airborne troops. The first M1 carbines were delivered in mid-1942, with initial priority given to troops in the European Theater of Operations.

Combat use

World War II

The M1 carbine with its reduced-power .30 cartridge was not originally intended to serve as a primary weapon for combat infantrymen, nor was it comparable to more powerful assault rifles developed late in the war. Nevertheless, the carbine was soon widely issued to infantry officers, and the American paratroopers, NCOs, ammunition bearers, forward artillery observers, and other frontline troops. Its reputation in front-line combat was mixed. Some soldiers and Marines, especially those who were unable to use a full-size rifle as their primary weapon, preferred the carbine over the Garand because of the weapon’s small size and light weight.

The carbine gained generally high praise from airborne troops in the early stages of the war who were issued the folding-stock M1A1, though negative reports began to surface with airborne operations in Sicily in 1943, and increased during the fall and winter of 1944.

In the Pacific theatre, soldiers and guerrilla forces operating in heavy jungle with only occasional enemy contact generally praised the carbine for its combination of light weight, short overall length, and accuracy at close ranges. The carbine’s exclusive use of non-corrosive primered ammunition was found to be a godsend by troops and ordnance personnel serving in the Pacific, where barrel corrosion was a significant issue with .30-06 weapons such as the M1 Garand rifle and the BAR, though not to the same extent in Europe, where some soldiers reported misfires attributed to the weaker noncorrosive primers. Other soldiers and Marines engaged in frequent daily firefights (particularly those serving in the Philippines) found the weapon to have insufficient stopping power and penetration. Reports of the carbine’s failure to stop enemy soldiers, sometimes after multiple hits, appeared in individual after-action reports, postwar evaluations, and service histories of both the U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corps. Aware of these shortcomings, the U.S. Army, its Pacific Command Ordnance staff, and the Aberdeen small arms facility continued to work on shortened versions of the Garand throughout the war, though none was ever officially adopted.

Some troops also found the .30 Carbine cartridge incapable of penetrating small trees and light cover, though it was markedly superior to .45 caliber weapons such as the Reising and Thompson submachineguns in accuracy and penetration. Lt. Col. John George, a small arms expert and intelligence officer serving in Burma with Merrill’s Marauders, reported that the .30 carbine bullet would easily penetrate the front and back of steel helmets, as well as the body armor used by Japanese forces of the era.


Initially, the M1 Carbine was intended to have a selective-fire capability, but the decision was made to put the M1 into production without this feature. Fully-automatic capability was incorporated into the design of the M2 (an improved, selective-fire version of the M1), introduced in 1944. Parts kits T17 and T18 allowed the conversion in the field of semi-auto M1 carbines into selective fire M2 configuration.

The M3 carbine (a selective-fire M2 with the M1 infrared night sight or sniperscope) was first used in combat by Army units during the invasion of Okinawa. For the first time, U.S. soldiers had a weapon that allowed them to visually detect Japanese infiltrating into American lines at night, even during pitch blackness. A team of two or three soldiers was used to operate the weapon and provide support. At night, the scope would be used to detect Japanese patrols and assault units moving forwards. At that point, the operator would fire a burst of automatic fire at the greenish images of enemy soldiers. The M3 with the M1 sight had an effective range of about 70 yards (limited by the visual capabilities of the sight). Fog and rain further reduced the weapon’s effective range. It is estimated that fully 30% of Japanese casualties inflicted by rifle and carbine fire during the Okinawan campaign were caused by the M3 carbine and its M1 sniperscope.

Korean War

The M2 Carbine continued in use during the Korean War. The weapon featured a selective-fire switch allowing optional fully-automatic fire at a rather high rate (850-900 rpm) and a 30-round magazine. The M3 carbine with an improved M2 (later, M3) infrared sniperscope also returned to combat, and was used principally during the static stages of the conflict against night infiltrators. The M3 with the improved M3 night sight had an effective range of approximately 125 yards.

In Korea, all versions of the carbine soon acquired a poor reputation for jamming in extreme cold weather conditions, eventually traced to inadequate recoil impulse and weak return springs. A 1951 official U.S. Army evaluation of scores of individual after-action combat reports noted the weapon’s cold-weather shortcomings, and recorded complaints by troops for failure to stop heavily-clothed or gear-laden North Korean and Chinese troops at close range after multiple hits.


The M2 carbine was again issued to some U.S. troops in Vietnam, particularly reconnaissance units (LRRP) and advisors as a substitute standard weapon. These weapons began to be replaced by the M14 in the early 1960s which in turn was replaced by the M16 in the late 1960s, and many M1, M2, and M3 Carbines were given to the South Vietnamese. A number were later captured at various points of the conflict by Vietcong, who have at least on one occasion removed the folding stock from the M1A1 carbine and adapted it to another weapon.

The M1/M2 carbine and the M14 were finally replaced by the M16 in the mid-1960s. The M1/M2/M3 carbines were the most heavily produced family of U.S. military weapons for several decades, most of these being the M1 version.

Design and operation

A U.S. anti-tank crew in combat in the Netherlands, November 4, 1944. The soldier on the far right is holding an M1 Carbine

The M1 carbine’s bolt mechanism is similar to the M1 rifle, though the carbine has a different gas system and trigger mechanism design. The gas system is a lightweight tappet-and-slide gas system. Initially fed from a 15 round magazine, a 30 round magazine was introduced for the M2.

The very first carbines, those made before mid-1943, were originally equipped with a “V-cut” extractor for removal of the fired round from the chamber. The “V-cut” design was found to be flawed and unreliable. In the field “V-cut” extractors were reground to a straight configuration, which enhanced reliability, until factory production was able to supply the better design.

The .30 Carbine cartridge was intermediate in both muzzle energy (ME) and muzzle velocity (MV). It is essentially a rimless version of the obsolete .32 Winchester Self-Loading cartridge. The .30 Carbine had a round-nose 110 gr (7.1 g) bullet, in contrast to the spitzer bullet designs found in most full-power rifle cartridges of the day. From the M1 carbine’s 18 in (460 mm) barrel, the .30 Carbine cartridge produced a muzzle velocity of approximately 1,970 ft/s (600 m/s), a velocity between that of contemporary submachine guns (approximately 900 to 1,600 ft/s (300500 m/s)) and full-power rifles and light machine guns (approximately 2,400 to 2,800 ft/s (700900 m/s)). At the M1 carbine’s maximum effective combat range of 300 yards (270 m), its bullet has about the same energy as pistol rounds like the 7mm Nambu do at the muzzle. Bullet drop is significant past 200 yards (180 m).

One characteristic of .30 Carbine ammunition is that from the beginning of production, non-corrosive primers were specified. This was the first major use of this type primer in a military firearm. Because the rifle had a closed gas system, not normally disassembled, corrosive primers would have led to a rapid deterioration of the gas system. The use of non-corrosive primers was a novelty in service ammunition at this time. Some misfires were reported in early lots of .30 Carbine ammunition, attributed to moisture ingress of the non-corrosive primer compound.

Categorizing the M1 carbine series has been the subject of much debate. The M1 is sufficiently accurate at short ranges. At 100 yards (91 m), it can deliver groups of between 3 and 5 minutes of angle, sufficient for its intended purpose as a close-range defensive weapon. Its muzzle energy and range are beyond those of any submachine gun of the period, though its bullet is much lighter in weight and smaller in diameter than that of .45 caliber weapons, and much less powerful than those of other service rifles of the period. The M1 and later M2 carbines were never designed to be assault rifles, such as the later German StG44 and Russian AK-47, and the .30 Carbine cartridge gives up significant muzzle velocity (roughly 350 ft/s (110 m/s)) to both. Additionally, the bullets used in the cartridges of the AK-47 and StG44 are spitzer designs, and suffer less energy loss and trajectory drop at distances beyond 100 yards. Most authorities list the effective combat range of the M1 carbine at around 200 yards, compared to 250-300 yards (230270 m) for the AK-47 and StG44.


A United States Marine equipped with an M1 Carbine in the Battle of Iwo Jima, February 1945. An M8 grenade launcher can be seen attached to the muzzle of the weapon

The M1 carbine was used with the M8 grenade launcher, which was fired with the M6 cartridge to launch 22 mm rifle grenades. It also accepts the M4 bayonet, which was based on the M3 knife. The M4 bayonet formed the basis for the later M6 and M7 bayonet-knives. The carbine was modified from its original design to incorporate a bayonet, due to requests from the field. Very few carbines with bayonet lugs reached the front lines before the end of World War II. This modification was made to nearly all carbines during arsenal rebuild following World War II. By the time the Korean War began, the bayonet-equipped M1 was standard issue. It is now rare to find a non bayonet lug-equipped original M1 carbine. As carbines were reconditioned at arsenals, parts such as the magazine catch, rear sight, barrel band with bayonet lug, and stock were upgraded with the current standard issue parts, usually parts as redesigned for the M2 carbine. EAD.

During World War II, the T23 flash hider was also developed, which could greatly reduce muzzle flash; it was developed from an earlier model for the Garand.

Production and foreign usage

A total of over 6 million M1 carbines of various models were manufactured, making it the most produced small arm for the American military during World War II. Despite being designed by Winchester, the great majority of these were made by other companies (see list of Military contractors below). The largest producer was the Inland division of General Motors, but many others were made by contractors as diverse as IBM, the Underwood Typewriter Company, and the Rock-Ola jukebox company. Few contractors made all the parts for carbines bearing their name: some makers bought parts from other major contractors or sub-contracted minor parts to companies like Marlin Firearms or Auto-Ordnance. Parts by all makers were required to be interchangeable. Irwin-Pedersen models were the fewest produced, at a little over 4,000. Many carbines were refurbished at several arsenals after the war, with many parts interchanged from original maker carbines. True untouched war production carbines, therefore, are the most desirable for collectors.

The SAS used the M1 & M1A1 carbines after 1943. The weapon was taken into use simply because a decision had been taken by Allied authorities to supply .30 caliber weapons from US stocks in the weapons containers dropped to Resistance groups sponsored by an SOE, or later also Office of Strategic Services (OSS), organizer, on the assumption the groups so supplied would be operating in areas within the operational boundaries of U.S. forces committed to Operation Overlord.[citation needed] They were found to be suited to the kind of operation the two British, two French, and one Belgian Regiment carried out. It was handy enough to parachute with, and, in addition, could be easily stowed in an operational Jeep. These weapons continued to be utilized as late as the Malayan Emergency. Other specialist intelligence collection units, such as 30 Assault Unit sponsored by the Naval Intelligence Division of the British Admiralty, which operated across the entire Allied area of operations, also made use of this weapon.[citation needed]

Small numbers of captured carbines were used by German forces in World War II, particularly after D-Day. The German designation for captured carbines was Selbstladekarabiner 455(a). The “(a)” came from the country name in German; in this case, Amerika.

A variant was produced shortly after WWII by the Japanese manufacturer Howa Machinery, under U.S. supervision. These were issued to all branches of the Japan Self-Defense Forces, and large numbers of them found their way to Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War.

Numerous examples were obtained and used by the Israeli Palmach-based special forces in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Because of their compact size and semi-auto capabilities, they were given to reconnaissance companies of the Israel Defence Forces.

It was also used by police and border guard in Bavaria after WWII and into the 1950s. The carbines were stamped according to the branch they were in service with; for instance, those used by the border guard were stamped “Bundesgrenzschutz”. Some of these weapons were modified with different sights, finishes, and sometimes new barrels.

After the Korean War, the carbine was widely exported to U.S. allies and client states (such as South Korea, Taiwan and other European allies), and was used as a frontline weapon well into the Vietnam era. The M1 carbine was also issued to the Korean and Israeli military and police forces.

The M1A1 was also used by the French Paratroopers (such as the 1er RCP) during the Algerian War from 1954 to 1962.

The Police Field Force of the Royal Malaysian Police, along with other units of the British Army in the Malayan Emergency, were issued the M2 Carbine for both jungle patrols and outpost defense. The Royal Ulster Constabulary also used the M1 carbine.

Current military use

The Israeli police still uses the M1 carbine as a standard long gun for non-combat elements and Mash’az volunteers. During the late 1990s, the police started to issue a Micro Galil variant called the Magal chambered in .30 Carbine, but after extensive problems with various malfunctions, they withdrew the weapon from service in 2001.

In Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, a police battalion named BOPE (Batalho de Operaes Policiais Especiais, or “Special Police Operations Battalion”) still uses the M1 carbine.

The government of the Philippines still issues M1 carbines to the infantrymen of the Philippine Army’s 2nd Infantry Division[citation needed] assigned in Luzon Island (some units are issued just M14 Automatic Rifles and M1 Carbines) and the Civilian Auxiliary Forces Geographical Unit or (CAFGU) and Civilian Volunteer Organizations (CVO)spread throughout the Philippine archipelago. Certain provincial police units of the Philippine National Police (PNP) still uses government issue M1 carbines as well as some operating units of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). In certain provinces of the Philippines such as Cavite, Batangas and Pangasinan, M1 carbines are still highly valued by many folks not for nostalgic or historical reasons, but being the most preferred weapon for use in ambushcades when a blood feud is involve. Elements of the New People’s Army and Islamic Secessionist movement value the carbine as a light weight weapon and preferred choice for mountain operation and ambush operations. The M1 carbine in a way have become one of the most recognized firearms in Philippine society, with the Marikina City based ARMSCOR Philippines still continuing to manufacture Philippine made .30 caliber ammunition for the Philippine market.


This section needs additional citations for verification.

Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2009)

Allies of World War II (1940s)

 Austria (1950s70s, Austrian Army and Police)

 Bavaria (1945arly 1950s, Border Guard)

 Brazil (present, BOPE)

 Cambodia (19671975)


 France (1954-1962, Algerian War)

 Germany (German Border Guard, some Police forces and German Army paratroopers (1950s-1960s)

 Greece (Hellenic (Greek) Air Force until mid 80s)

 Israel (19451957, Israel Defence Forces; 1970sresent, Israel Police; 1974resent, Civil Guard)

 Italy (Carabinieri, as of 1992)

 Japan (National Police Reserve)(1950-1989)


 Mexico (police departments and security forces)

 Netherlands (1940s-70s, Army and Police)

 Norway (Norwegian Army 1951-70, with some Norwegian police units until the 1990s)

 Philippines (Post-WWII)

 South Korea (1950s-Present, Reserve Force)

 Turkey (Used by Troops in South Korea)

 Suriname (?-Present, Army)

 South Vietnam (1960s70s)

 Taiwan (Republic of China) (1950s-present)

 Thailand Locally known as the .87.

 Vietnam (Captured Batches)

 United Kingdom

 United States (1940s60s/70s, Armed Forces) and some law enforcement agencies (1940s-present)


M1A1 Carbine. Paratrooper model with folding buttstock.

Carbine, Cal .30, M1A1

Folding stock, 15-round magazine

Paratrooper model

About 150,000 produced

Carbines originally issued with the M1A1 folding stock were made by Inland, a division of General Motors. Inland production of M1A1 carbines was interspersed with Inland production of M1 carbines with the standard stock. Stocks were often swapped out as carbines were refurbished at arsenals. An original Inland carbine with an original M1A1 stock is rare today.

Carbine, Cal .30, M1A2

Proposed variant with improved sight adjustable for windage and elevation

Produced only as ‘overstamped’ model (an arsenal-refurbished M1 with new rear sight and other late M1 improvements)

Carbine, Cal .30, M1A3

Pantograph stock, 15-round magazine

Type standardized to replace the M1A1 but may not have been issued.

Pantograph stock was more rigid than the M1A1’s folding stock and folded flush under the fore end.

Carbine, Cal .30, M2

Early 1945

Selective fire (capable of fully-automatic fire)

30-round magazine

About 600,000 produced

Initially, the M1 Carbine was intended to have a selective-fire capability, but the decision was made to put the M1 into production without this feature. Fully-automatic capability was incorporated into the design of the M2 (an improved, selective-fire version of the M1), introduced in 1944. The M2 had a revised wood stock and featured the late M1 improvements to rear sight, a bayonet lug, and other minor changes.

Although some carbines were marked at the factory as M2, the only significant difference between an M1 and M2 carbine is the fire control group. The military issued field conversion kits (T17 and T18) to convert an M1 to an M2. (Legally a carbine marked M2 is always a machinegun for national firearms registry purposes.)

Other changes developed for the M2 were a 30 round magazine with three catch nibs (as opposed to two on the fifteen round magazine); and a magazine catch with a third retaining surface. These M2 parts including the heavier M2 stock were standardized for arsenal rebuild of M1 and M1A1 carbines.

(A modified round bolt replaced the original flat top bolt to save machining steps in manufacture. Many sources erroneously refer to this round bolt as an ‘M2 bolt’ but it was developed as a standard part for new manufacture M1 and later M2 carbines and as a replacement part, with priority given to use on M1A1 and M2 carbines. The slightly heavier round bolt did moderate the cyclic rate of the M2 on full automatic.)

Carbine, Cal. 30, M2A2

Arsenal-refurbished (overstamped M2) model

Carbine, Cal .30, M3

M2 with mounting (T3 mount) for an early active (infrared) night vision sight.

About 3,000 produced.

Three versions of night sight (M1, M2, M3)

Original Korean War era USMC M3 Sniperscope

The M3 carbine was an M2 carbine fitted with a mount designed to accept an infrared sight for use at night. It was initially used with the M1 sniperscope, an active infrared sight, and saw action in 1945 with the Army during the invasion of Okinawa. Before the M3 carbine and M1 sniperscope were type-classified, they were known as the T3 and T120, respectively. The system continued to be developed, and by the time of the Korean War, the M3 carbine was used with the M3 sniperscope.

The M2 sniperscope extended the effective nighttime range of the M3 carbine to 100 yards. In the later stages of the Korean War, an improved version of the M3 carbine, with a revised mount, a forward pistol grip, and a new M3 sniperscope design was used in the latter stages of Korea and briefly in Vietnam. The M3 sniperscope had a large active infrared spotlight mounted on top of the scope body itself, allowing use in the prone position. The revised M3/M3 had an effective range of around 125 yards. Eventually, the M3 carbine and its M3 sniperscope would be superseded by passive-design night vision scopes with extended visible ranges; the improved scopes in turn required the use of rifle-caliber weapons with flatter trajectories and increased hit probability.

Military contractors

Inland Division, General Motors (production: 2,632,097), sole producer of the M1A1 Carbine. Receiver marked “INLAND DIV.”

Winchester Repeating Arms (production: 828,059) Receiver marked “WINCHESTER”

Irwin-Pedersen (operated by Saginaw Steering Gear and production included with Saginaw total)

Saginaw Steering Gear Division General Motors (production: 517,213 ) Receivers marked “SAGINAW S.G.” (370,490) and “IRWIN-PEDERSEN” (146,723 )

Underwood Elliot Fisher (production: 545,616) Receiver marked “UNDERWOOD”

National Postal Meter (production: 413,017) Receiver marked “NATIONAL POSTAL METER”

Quality Hardware Manufacturing Corp. (production: 359,666) Receiver marked “QUALITY H.M.C.”

International Business Machines (production: 346,500) Receiver marked “I.B.M. CORP.”

Standard Products (production: 247,100) Receiver marked “STD. PRO.”

Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corporation (production: 228,500) Receiver Marked “ROCK-OLA”

Commercial Controls Corporation (production: 239) Receiver marked “COMMERCIAL CONTROLS”

Commercial copies

Several companies manufactured copies of the M1 Carbine after World War II, which varied in quality. Some companies used a combination of original USGI and new commercial parts, while others manufactured entire firearms from new parts, which may or may not be of the same quality as the originals. These copies were marketed to the general public and police agencies but were not made for or used by the U.S. military.

An Auto-Ordnance AOM-130 Carbine manufactured in 2007.

In 1963, firearms designer Melvin M. Johnson introduced a version of the M1 Carbine called the “Spitfire” that fired a 5.7 mm (.22 in) wildcat cartridge known as the 5.7 mm MMJ or .22 Spitfire. Johnson advertised the smaller caliber and the modified carbine as a survival rifle for use in jungles or other remote areas. While the concept had some military application when used for this role in the selective-fire M2 Carbine, it was not pursued and few Spitfire carbines were made.

More recently, the Auto-Ordnance division of Kahr Arms began production of an M1 Carbine replica in 2005. The original Auto-Ordnance had produced various replacement parts for IBM during World War II, but did not manufacture complete carbines until the introduction of this replica. The AOM110 and AOM120 models (no longer produced) featured birch stocks and handguards, Parkerized receivers, flip-style rear sights and barrel bands without bayonet lugs. The current AOM130 and AOM140 models are identical except for American walnut stocks and handguards.

An Israeli arms company (Advanced Combat Systems) offers a modernized bullpup variant called the Hezi SM-1. The company claims accuracy of 1.5 MOA at 100 yards (91 m).

Other commercial manufacturers have included:


Auto-Ordnance (now a subsidiary of Kahr Arms)

Howa made carbines and parts for the post-WWII Japanese and Thai militaries, and limited numbers of a hunting rifle version

Erma Werke made carbines and parts for the post-WWII West German military, and .22 replica carbines for export

Israel Arms International (IAI) of Houston Texas assembled carbines from parts from other sources

National Ordnance

Texas Armament Co.

Plainfield Machine Co. (later purchased and operated by Iver Johnson)

Universal Firearms – Early Universal guns were, like other manufacturers, assembled from USGI parts. However, beginning in 1968, the company began producing the “New Carbine”, which externally resembled the M1 but was in fact a completely new firearm internally, using a different receiver, bolt carrier, bolt, recoil spring assembly, etc. with almost no interchangeability with USGI carbines.

Universal was also later purchased by Iver Johnson.

The Iver Johnson company produced carbines in the style of Plainfield Machine Co. and followed the lead of Universal in producing a pistol version called the “Enforcer”.

Hunting and civilian use

Patty Hearst holding an M1 carbine during her infamous bank robbery attempt.

A famous photograph of Malcolm X holding an M1 with two 30-round magazines “jungle-clipped” together.

The M1 carbine is still in use today by many civilian shooters and police around the world. The .30 Carbine cartridge is used for a number of types of hunting, including white-tailed deer, but is definitely underpowered for larger North American game such as elk, moose, and bear. Some U.S. states prohibit use of the cartridge for hunting deer and larger animals due to a lessened chance of killing an animal in a single shot, even with expanding bullets. The carbine is prohibited for hunting in several states such as Pennsylvania because of the semi-automatic function, and Illinois which prohibits all non-muzzleloading rifles for big game hunting. The .30 carbine cartridge and the M1 carbine are suitable for the same game targeted with the .32-20 Winchester and .32 Winchester Self-Loading cartridges and the hunting arms made in those calibers.

The ease of use and great adaptability of the weapon led to it being used by Malcolm X (as a self-defense tool) and Patty Hearst (as a bank robbery weapon). Both were featured in famous news photographs carrying the M1 carbine.

Related equipment and accessories

Ammunition types

Main article: .30 Carbine

The ammunition used by the military with the carbine include:

Cartridge, Caliber .30, Carbine, Ball, M1

Cartridge, Grenade, Caliber .30, M6 (also authorized for other blank firing uses, due to a lack of a dedicated blank cartridge)

Cartridge, Caliber .30, Carbine, Dummy, M13

Cartridge, Caliber .30, Carbine, Ball, Test, High Pressure, M18

Cartridge, Caliber .30, Carbine, Tracer, M16 (also rated as having an incendiary effect)

Cartridge, Caliber .30, Carbine, Tracer, M27 (dimmer illumination and no incendiary effect)



^ Julian S. Hatcher, Hatcher’s Notebook, Military Service Publishing Co., 1947

^ Walter H.B. Smith, Rifles, Military Service Publishing Co., 1948.

^ Larry Ruth, M1 Carbine: Design, Development & Production, (The Gun Room Press, 1979, ISBN 088227-020-6) contains many Ordnance documents related to the “Light Rifle” specification that led to the M1 carbine

^ a b c Canfield, Bruce N., “‘Carbine’ Williams: Myth & Reality”, The American Rifleman, February 2009.

^ Bishop, Chris (1998), The Encyclopedia of Weapons of World War II, New York: Orbis Publiishing Ltd, ISBN 0-7607-1022-8 .

^ Weeks, John, World War II Small Arms, Orbis Publishing (1979), p. 130

^ a b George, John, Shots Fired In Anger, NRA Press (1981), p. 394

^ Rush, Robert S., GI: The US Infantryman in World War II, Osprey Publishing Ltd. (2003), ISBN 1841767395, p. 33: Officers were issued .45 M1911 pistols as individual weapons until 1943, when they were issued the M1 Carbine in place of the pistol.

^ Rush, Robert S., GI: The US Infantryman in World War II, Osprey Publishing Ltd. (2003), ISBN 1841767395, pp. 33-35: Officers and NCOs, as well as airborne and other elite troops were frequently allowed to exchange with Ordnance personnel for their individual weapon of choice.

^ Shore, C. (Capt), With British Snipers To The Reich, Lancer Militaria Press (1988), pp. 191-195: Small-statured men such as Capt. Shore and Sgt. Audie Murphy liked the carbine, as its small stock dimensions fit them particularly well.

^ Gavin, James M. (Lt. Gen.), War and Peace in the Space Age, New York: Harper and Brothers (1958), pp. 57, 63: Col. Gavin’s love affair with his M1A1 carbine ended in Sicily, when his carbine and that of Maj. Vandervoort jammed repeatedly. Noticing that carbine fire rarely suppressed rifle fire from German infantry, he and Vandervoort traded with wounded soldiers for their M1 rifles and ammunition; Gavin carried an M1 rifle for the rest of the war.

^ Burgett, Donald, Seven Roads To Hell, New York: Dell Publishing (1999), ISBN 0440236274 pp. 153-154: Burgett, a machine-gunner in the 101st Airborne from Normandy to the Battle of the Bulge, witnessed several failures of the .30 carbine to stop German soldiers after being hit.

^ a b Shore, C. (Capt), With British Snipers To The Reich, Lancer Militaria Press (1988), pp. 191-195

^ a b Dunlap, Roy, Ordnance Went Up Front, Samworth Press (1948), p. 297

^ U.S. Army, Handbook on Japanese Military Forces: Body armor, Technical Manual, 15 September 1944, Chap. X, sec. 4(b)

^ George, John, Shots Fired In Anger NRA Press (1981), p. 450

^ a b c d Rush, Robert S., US Infantryman in World War II, Osprey Publishing (2002), ISBN 1841763306, 9781841763309, p.53

^ a b c d M3 Infra Red Night Sight Article

^ Dill, James, Winter of the Yalu, Changjin Journal 06.22.00

^ a b S.L.A. Marshall, Commentary on Infantry and Weapons in Korea 1950-51, 1st Report ORO-R-13 of 27 October 1951, Project Doughboy [Restricted], Operations Research Office (ORO), U.S. Army (1951)

^ Diagram Group (1991), Weapons: An international encyclopedia from 5000 B.C. to 2000 A.D., New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., ISBN 0-312-03950-6 .

^ a b Barnes, Frank C., Cartridges of the World, 6th ed., DBI Books Inc. (1989), p. 52

^ Dunlap, Roy, Ordnance Went Up Front, Samworth Press (1948), p. 293

^ “A Pocket History of the M1 Carbine” – Fulton Armory

^ Donald M. Goldstein, Katherine V. Dillon and J. Michael Wenger, Nuts! The Battle of the Bulge, Brassey’s, 1994, ISBN-0-02-881069-4. Page 75, photo 4-69, captured German film shows German officer armed with a M1 carbine in the Battle of the Bulge, Dec 1944.


^ William, Jack and Moran, Grace Spearhead in Malaya 1959 P. Davies, p. 239

^ Crawford, Oliver, The Door Marked Malaya, London: Rupert Hart-Davis (1958), p. 88

^ Central Office of Information British Information Services Survey of Current Affairs 1977 H.M Stationary Office

^ Hogg, Ian (1989). Jane’s Infantry Weapons 1989-90, 15th Edition. Jane’s Information Group. p. 216. ISBN 0710608896. 

^ Jones, Richard (2009). Jane’s Infantry Weapons 2009-2010. Jane’s Information Group. p. 898. ISBN 0710628692. 

^ Larry Ruth, M1 Carbine: Design, Development & Production, Gun Room Press, 1979, p.173.

^ Canfield, June 2007, p. 37

^ Rock-Ola M1 Carbine

^ The Spitfire fired a 40-grain (2.6 g) bullet with a muzzle velocity of 2850 ft/s (870 m/s) for a muzzle energy of 720 foot-pounds force (980 J). Barnes, Frank C. Cartridges of the World (DBI, 1978), p.127.

^ Barnes, 1989 edition.

^ “Auto-Ordnance M1 Carbines” –

^ “M1 Carbine” – American Rifleman

^ “ACS Hezi SM-1” –

^ “HEZI SM-1 Upgrade” –

^ “Universal Firearms Corporation” –

^ Pennsylvania Game Commission – State Wildlife Management Agency: Deer Hunting Laws and Regulations

^ Illinois: Digest of Hunting and Trapping Regulations 2007-2008, “Statewide Deer Hunting Information”, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, p. 11.

^ TM 9-1305-200/TO 11A13-1-101 Small-Arms Ammunition, 1961, p. 39-41


This section includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (April 2009)

Barnes, Frank C., Cartridges of the World, DBI Books Inc., 1975, 1978, 1989.

Canfield, Bruce N. (June 2007). A New Lease on Life: The Post-World War II M1 Carbine. American Rifleman. 

Dunlap, Roy F. Ordnance Went Up Front. The Samworth Press, 1948.

George, John (Lt. Col.), Shots Fired In Anger, NRA Press, 1981.

Hufnagl, Wolfdieter. U.S.Karabiner M1 Waffe und Zubehr, Motorbuchverlag, 1994.

IBM Archives

Korean War cold weather malfunctions

Marshall, S.L.A., Commentary on Infantry and Weapons in Korea 1950-51, 1st Report ORO-R-13, Project Doughboy, Report ORO-R-13 of 27 October 1951 [Restricted], Operations Research Office (ORO), U.S. Army (1951)

Shore, C. (Capt), With British Snipers To The Reich, Lancer Militaria Press (1988)

United States Government. Departments of the Army and Air Force. TM 9-1305-200/TO 11A13-1-101 Small-Arms Ammunition. Washington, DC: Departments of the Army and Air Force, 1961.

U.S. Army Catalog of Standard Ordnance Items. Second Edition 1944, Volume III, p. 419

Weeks, John, World War II Small Arms, London: Orbis Publishing Ltd. and New York: Galahad Books, ISBN 0883654032 (1979)

Worrell, Jessica (2003). “Range of a Rifle Bullet”. The Physics Factbook. 

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: M1 Carbine

US Army M1 Carbine Technical Manual

M1 Carbine Article

M1 Carbine Family: M1, M1A1, M2, M3

The M1/M2 Carbine Magazine FAQ

Auto-Ordnance M1 Carbines

90th Reference manual page including FM 23-7 Carbine, 1942 manual

Articles page including information on blank adapting the M1 carbine

M1 Carbine page at Modern Firearms

v  d  e

U.S. infantry weapons of World War II and Korea

Side arms

M1911/M1911A1 pistol  M1917 revolver  Smith & Wesson “Victory” revolver

Rifles and carbines

M1903 Springfield  M1 Garand  M1 carbine  M1941 Johnson Rifle  M1918 BAR

Submachine guns

M1928/M1/M1A1 Thompson (“Tommy Gun”)  M3 “Grease Gun”  Reising M50/M55  United Defense M42


Mk 2


Winchester Model 1897  Ithaca M37  Winchester Model 1912

Machine guns and larger

M1917 Browning  M1919 Browning  M1941 Johnson LMG  M2 Browning  Bazooka  M2 flamethrower


.45 ACP  .38 Special  .30-06 Springfield  .30 Carbine  .50 BMG

Categories: 7.62 mm firearms | World War II American infantry weapons | World War II semi-automatic rifles | Cold War infantry weapons | Vietnam War weapons | Korean War infantry weapons | Curio and relic firearmsHidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements from April 2007 | Articles with unsourced statements from November 2009 | Articles needing additional references from December 2009 | All articles needing additional references | Articles lacking in-text citations from April 2009 | All articles lacking in-text citations

Source by dpdp

Bureau One – Review – The Make $15,000 A Month Mailing Two Letters Scam?

Bureau One is a company in Las Vegas, Nevada claimed by many to be a scam. If you’ve received a one-page, two-sided letter describing the opportunity which is headlined with the following, $15,000 A MONTH!!just mail the two letters we give you, your name!!!, then you know that this may or may not be a scam. Here are three objective points that need to be considered regarding this home based business opportunity.

Point #1: Bureau One has chosen to market this opportunity through direct marketing. They create their one-page, two-sided sales letter with what seems to be a simple template that can be generated in a program like Microsoft Word. Burea One is then likely purchasing home based business opportunity leads from list brokers, who’s sole business is gathering information on home based business opportunitiy seekers (names, addresses, email addresses) and selling these databases of names and information to companies like Burea One. These techniques are solid marketing techniques but lists can be expensive and don’t guarantee results.

Point #2: Bureau One’s sales letter uses a lot of action words. Words and phrases like ‘decide’, ‘take action right now’ are well placed and the sales letter tells a story of what is possible if you believe what they are telling you. These are well thought out marketing techniques built into the copy/wording of the letter.

Point #3: Bureau One personalizes the sales letter by addressing the addressee by name through-out the copy. Again, this is a good marketing technique as we all like to be called by our name, it personalizes the sales pitch. Bureau One has made affective use of a word processing and data base software program to do this.

All three points above, show the effective use of some simple marketing strategies. Is Bureau One, Las Vegas, Nevada a scam? Well, I’ve heard many successful people referred to as scam artists. A scam is a scam from one side’s perspective. I am not endorsing or claiming Bureau One to be a scam. Any business can be successful if marketed properly and yes, unfortunately even illegitimate, illegal scams.

The next thing you should do is continue your due diligence on Bureau One, but realize that any business opportunity you pursue should be legal, ethical and you should know how to market it well and maybe even incorporate some of the methods outlined in the points above that Bureau One has used.

Think of McDonald’s when you think about marketing. They sell a lot of hamburgers, french fries, soda and ice cream. They don’t have ‘the best product in town’ but the certainly sell the most in most areas they are in. All because of marketing!

Source by Ray Oswald

Nevada Pest Control- Understanding Las Vegas Pest Control

Las Vegas is the most populous city, in the U.S State of Nevada; and the self proclaimed “Entertainment Capital of the World”.  This bustling city was developed in an arid basin, surrounded by dry mountains; and a rocky and dusty landscape. Nevertheless, within the city of Las Vegas you will discover lush lawns, trees, palatial greenery; and a haven for pests.  The introduction of humans, homes and innovation to the desert Las Vegas region, has created an environment that supports the growth, development and spread of Las Vegas pest control problems.  The increase in water and food sources, coupled with hot summers and moderate winters; has contributed significantly, to the need for Las Vegas pest control.

Pest control problems, like spiders and ants, cause more damage to real estate in the United States; than fires and storms combined.  Varying weather and other climatic factors, through out the United States; create pockets of specialized pest problems.  In the State of Nevada, pest control specialists battle highly aggressive pests; like the Red Imported Fire Ant and Black Widow spider. These tiny pests bite and inflict painful skin welts and even death; with their toxin.

The Red Imported Fire Ant was accidentally introduced into the United States through a seaport in Mobile, Alabama. Cargo ships from Brazil, docking in Mobile, unloaded goods that were infested with the ants. Since that time, they have spread from Alabama to almost every state of the American South; from Texas to Maryland. Their mound-building activity has damaged plant roots, lead to crop loss, and interfered with mechanical cultivation. It is not uncommon for fire ant mounds to appear suddenly in a rural/suburban yard or field. The Red Imported Fire Ant’s sting is rarely life-threatening to humans, however 80 deaths have been documented; as of 2006. Moreover, one Queen Imported Fire Ant can produce 1,600 new ant eggs each day; creating major concerns for Las Vegas pest control.

Nevada spider pests include the Black Widow spider, Nevada Orb spider, Jumping spider, and Wolf spider.  The female Black Widow’s bite is particularly harmful to humans (males almost never bite humans), and the toxic venom injection from these pests; can be lethal.  It is said that Black Widow spiders will avoid human dwellings, but are more common in outhouses and garages. Nevertheless, a spider pest infestation is not easily corrected, and as such, Las Vegas pest control strategies must employ technology and solutions; developed in Universities across the United States.  An educated and focused strategy, is a  Las Vegas homeowner’s best recourse.

The environment surrounding Las Vegas is dominated by desert vegetation and some wildlife; and as such, is not ideal for pests.  The pest invaders are drawn to the abundant, lush garden oasis; in Nevada’s most populous city.  In Las Vegas, increased efforts to address water resource issues, have inspired a movement; that encourages xeriscapes, instead of traditional lawns.  Xerogardening reduces- and sometimes eliminates, the need for supplemental irrigation; and as such, will generously support the decline of Las Vegas pest control problems.

Source by Weal Media

Student Marketing Company Introduces Student Recruitment Tool, Education Alerts

Boston-area student marketing company, Effective Student Marketing, introduces a new student recruitment marketing system, Education Alerts, at the Annual Career College Association Convention, held June 26-27 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Career College Association Convention and Exposition is the only one of its kind for the career college community..

Andover, MA (PRWEB) June 26, 2008–Boston-area

Student marketing company, Effective Student Marketing (ESM), introduces a new student recruitment marketing system, Education Alerts, at the Annual Career College Association (CCA) Convention, held June 26-27 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Education Alerts
Education Alerts is ESM’s online student marketing system for career schools and continuing education unsts of colleges and universities. Education Alerts is a dynamic content engine designed to produce an ongoing dialogue to excite and engage students and prospects. Through a consistent flow of relevant content, Education Alerts helps schools generate new leads, maintain a dialogue with existing prospects and build a strong market presence, ultimately leading to improved enrollment revenue and profitability of student marketing programs.

“We needed a way to reach the students looking for schools electronically. We had experience with other media, but didn’t know where to start with the internet and email. Education Alerts generated targeted ads, produced relevant content, and crafted direct response emails to reach students we previously didn’t know how to contact. We’ve definitely seen an increase in enrollments since we began Education Alerts.” says a California beauty school President.

Effective Student Marketing, Inc.
Effective Student Marketing, Inc. is a strategic marketing organization specializing in student lead generation programs, student marketing and student recruitment, designed exclusively to help career schools, colleges and continuing education units reach the right students at the right time. The management team has many years of combined senior level experience working exclusively in education marketing on the school side. Although ESM utilizes internet marketing tools and techniques, including cost per lead and search engine advertising, ESM’s staff of education marketing specialists have the experience, skills and knowledge to provide client schools with a full range of marketing services.

Career College Association Convention & Exposition
The Career College Association Convention & Exposition is the only one of its kind for the career college community. It consists of breakout sessions led by experts from a variety of different educational tracks, exhibits from business partners and servicers, and networking opportunities for industry associates. The event concludes with the Imagine America Foundation Gala where recognition and awards are given to members who have positively impacted business.

This year’s convention ‘Made in America: Education for a Global Marketplace’ will feature Conservative Political Visionary and Thought-Leader, Newt Gingrich and IBM Corporation, Innovation and Technology Executive Vice President, Nicholas M. Donofrio.

Attendees are typically presidents, owners, directors and administrators of career colleges – privately owned and publicly traded, certificate and degree-granting, credit hour and clock hour – from across the United States and Puerto Rico. The majority of the institutions are members of the Career College Association (CCA currently has nearly 1,200 member institutions). These convention attendees are the decision-makers and the most influential purchasers of products and services designed specifically for the private, post-secondary education industry. Typically, there are nearly 1,000 attendees who register for the CCA convention each year.

Career College Association Mission
The Career College Association (CCA) is a voluntary membership organization of accredited, private post-secondary schools, institutes, colleges and universities that provide career-specific education programs. CCA has nearly 1,200 members that educate and support over one million students each year for employment in over 200 occupational fields. CCA member institutions provide the full range of higher education programs: master and doctoral degree programs, two-and four-year associate and baccalaureate degree programs, and short-term certificate and diploma programs. Visit CCA at

Dotty Zukoff, Communications Director
Effective Student Marketing, Inc. Tel: 978-475-0880

Source by Melissa Griffin

Multi-Level Marketing in Las Vegas Requires Business License

If you are business-minded and believe you can be successful at multi-level marketing, even during these difficult economic times, you must know that you are going to be considered a business person in Southern Nevada.  This means you must have a business license.  Failure to have a business license when conducting a business is punishable by a fine and up to six months in jail.  Along with the business license, you are going to have to pay local taxes, including Nevada sales taxes.  You must operate this business like any other business, which means a course in business management and accounting is advisable.  If you need assistance in acquiring a business license, contact The Wright Law Offices.

If the multi-level marketer that recruited you told you that you do not require a license to operate the business, this is wrong advice and amounts to practicing law.  A person is not exempt from a business license just because the business is operated out of his or her home.

It is advisable that any new business person consult with and hire, on retainer, an attorney and an accountant (or bookkeeper).  Successful businesses build relationships with professionals that can answer questions and assist through difficult periods that all businesses face.

Multi-level marketing is a difficult, but potentially rewarding scheme for business.  It requires salesmanship, hard work, diligence, and determination.  If you are beginning to be successful, you will want to ensure that all your business basics are covered.  Failure to protect yourself puts everything you have worked hard for at risk.  Once you have failed, your credibility could be irreparably harmed.

This article is not intended to endorse MLM.

Source by Anthony Wright

The symbolic value of the Brand

The symbolic representation is usually composed of a name and images or concepts that distinguish it. When it comes to logo, usually we refer to the graphical representation and expertise in graphic design, where the brand can be represented by a combination of symbol and / or logo.

However, the concept of branding is far more comprehensive than its mere graphic representation. The introduction of his name and graphic representation – announced the “intention” of a product / service that translates your attributes and differentiates in the market.This is what makes it special and unique from its competitors.

The role of marketing is to constantly search for an association with the brand “personality” or a “mental image”. Thus, its purpose is to “tag” the image in the mind of the consumer, that is, make a positive association between the image and product quality.

The brand is essentially a promise from the company to provide a specific set of attributes, benefits and uniform services to buyers. Bailing us back to Kotler, quality assurance comes with the best brands, but a brand is a symbol more complex and may bring up to six levels of meaning: 
Attributes: the brand has the power to bring to mind certain attributes. 
Benefits: These benefits are translated into functional and emotional. 
Values: the brand also conveys the company’s values. 
Culture: the brand has the power to represent a certain culture. 
Personality: The brand can project a certain personality. 
User: The brand suggests the kind of consumer who can use a product. 
Creation of Value for the Consumer 
The brand is a contract. The brand reduces the risk that the consumer goes to purchase the product. Ensures a level of performance, irrespective of its distribution. 
The mark identifies. In a bid to products which are often indistinguishable brand recognition facilitates and promotes loyalty. As an example alcoholic drinks, televisions, mobile phones and so on. 
The brand apart. She appreciates the one who uses or consumes. It transmits its identity to people. For purchases of social status is essential added value brought by the mark. 
Creating Value for the Enterprise 
The brand has commercial value. The brand is a negotiable asset, either by selling the brand, either by rental or licensing of the brand. A strong brand allows higher prices (price premium or additional cost incurred by the mark). Between a Citizen and a Cartier, the difference in price for equal quality, he can be several hundred euros. The brand has value institutional or corporate. “The brand can develop a powerful sense of belonging among employees of a company. A strong brand has a strong influence on financial reporting. This explains, among other things, that some groups change their name to be listed on stock exchanges under the name of his best-known brand.

Source by logoemarca